Recent
Archive
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- May 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- October 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- January 2021
- September 2020
- July 2020
- May 2020
- February 2020
- November 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- December 2016
- September 2016
- July 2016
- April 2016
- February 2016
- December 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
Mental Health IPA: New Model may enable private practitioners to thrive in era of health care reform
A multidisciplinary group of mental health clinicians in Oregon has formed the first mental health Independent Practice Association (IPA) in the country. The IPA is designed to maximize clinician autonomy while enabling them to participate in health care reform–but as private practitioners, not as employees or contract workers. The organization that spearheaded this effort is the AMHA-USA (www.americanmentalhealth.com)
Health care reform introduces data analytic requirements that are difficult, if not impossible, to meet with traditional payer panels composed of individual private practitioners. As a result payers look for large groups, hospitals, and clinics where there is one point of accountability, where management can be handed off to the contracting group, and where systems are in place for big data analytics.
Of course, clinicians can become employees or contract workers for such groups, but the Oregon clinicians were looking for more autonomy and control. The IPA model has been around for decades but until now has been the exclusive preserve of physicians in private practice. Like the group model, the IPA model provides one point of accountability for contracting, enables management to be devolved to the members, and can deliver data.
The clinicians own the IPA and the the governing board is drawn from their ranks. IPA clinicians maintain their own offices, submit their own claims, and they can opt in or out of contracts negotiated by the IPA.
The challenge the Oregon folks faced in building the IPA infrastucture was considerable. The organizational tasks included setting up a board, incorporation, bylaws, provider agreements, bank accounts, member recruitment, marketing, contracting, and establishing policies and procedures. (For those interested, AMHA-USA offers IPA in a Box which is a complete starter kit including forms, etc).
To meet the data analytic challenge the IPA agreed to adopt a standard set of clinical protocols—intakes, progress notes, etc– from which data could be extracted for reporting. They also agreed on using one EHR (CarePaths eRecord) that enables automatic capture of clinical, demographic and claims data. The system then de-identifies the dataset required and transmits it to an analytics engine that creates the necessary reports.
So how has this new endeavour worked out? The Oregon folks have garnered two contracts with large multi-state insurers, enabling clinicians to become providers to hitherto closed networks. The contract increases reimbursements by 15 to 35% with further increases in outgoing years.
While it is too early to say if this model is a silver bullet for clinicians wishing to remain in private practice, it is certainly promising.