Recent
Archive
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- May 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- October 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- January 2021
- September 2020
- July 2020
- May 2020
- February 2020
- November 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- December 2016
- September 2016
- July 2016
- April 2016
- February 2016
- December 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
New findings suggest female clinicians better able to engage patients in treatment
An analysis of our data show that women clinicians are much better at engaging new patients in treatment than are male clinicians. We define engagement as coming for follow up treatment after an initial intake. We wanted to focus on non-medical providers, so we looked at Diagnostic Evaluation without a medical component (90791) between January 1, 2013 and September 30, 2013. Our data came from 13 practices that had been using Carepaths for at least 6 months as of the first of 2013. We limited our sample to patients who were first entered into the Carepaths database in 2013 because we wanted to minimize the number of patients who may have had a prior episode of care with these providers. We considered a patient to have been engaged in treatment if they received any service other than the 90791 during between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2013. Patients who did not receive another service before the end of 2013, were classified as not engaging in treatment.
Below is a table summarizing findings from 9 months of de-identified data from 2013. The sample size was N=4285; 122 clinicians of which 97 were women and 25 were men. In interpreting these results it should be borne in mind that the number of male clinicians is low and the variability in number of intakes without engagement highly variable among the sample. We also have no way of identifying cases seen intentionally for evaluation only.
The results, in a word, are eye-popping. Women therapists are much better at establishing and facilitating a therapeutic relationship with patients, male or female, than are male therapists. Interestingly, both male and female therapists did slightly better with their own gender patients.
It is of note that men represent an increasingly small percentage of the country’s psychiatrists, psychologists, therapists, and social workers: less than 20% of students in Master’s degrees in psychology, clinical social work or counseling are men. Today 76% of all new doctorate level psychologists are female; in 1975 70% of all psychology doctorates went to men.